Wednesday, April 21, 2010

Winning The Loser's Game

In the book, Investment Policy: How to Win the Loser’s Game, author Charles D. Ellis discusses the interesting conclusions of Dr. Simon Ramo. Ramo’s book on playing strategy, Extraordinary Tennis for the Ordinary Tennis Player (New York: Crown Publishes, 1977), identified the difference between a winner’s game and a loser’s game.

Over a period of many years Dr. Ramo observed that tennis was not one game, but two: one played by professionals and a very few gifted amateurs; the other played by all the rest of us.

After extensive scientific and statistical analysis, Dr. Ramo summed it up this way: Professionals win points; amateurs lose points.

In expert tennis, the ultimate outcome is determined by the actions of the winner. Professional tennis players stroke the ball with strong, well-aimed shots, though long and often exciting rallies, until one player is able to force an error by his opponent or to drive the ball just out of reach. These splendid players seldom make mistakes.

Amateur tennis, Dr. Ramo found, is almost entirely different. Brilliant shots, long and exciting rallies and seemingly miraculous recoveries are few and far between. The amateur player seldom beats his opponent; rather he beats himself all the time. The ball is fairly often hit into the net or out of bounds and double faults at service are not uncommon. The victor in this game of tennis eventually gets a higher score because his opponent is losing more points.

As a scientist and statistician, Dr. Ramo gathered data to test his hypothesis in a clever way. Instead of keeping conventional game scores—love, 15 all, 30-15, and so forth—he simply counted points won versus points lost. He found that in expert tennis about 80 percent of the points are won, but in amateur tennis about 80 percent of the points are lost through errors.

WHAT DETERMINES THE OUTCOME OF A TENNIS MATCH?

It’s not the equipment, the line judges, the weather, or even the players themselves that controls the outcome of a tennis match.

So then, what controls the outcome?

The ultimate factor that determines the outcome of a tennis match is the movement of the ball across the net.

The player who can concentrate and most effectively move the ball across the net will look up at the scoreboard and notice they’ve won the match. There is no need to be concerend with the score. This will only distract you from being the best you can be and focusing on the task at hand. This is true for tennis and for trading.

For me, my greatest success came when I finally decided to forget about the money (the scoreboard) and just concentrate on being the best trader I could be, which was my version of moving the ball across the net. I focused purely on making good decisions and working on my weaknesses until they became my strengths (not losing points).

Once you learn to move the ball across the net effectively on a regular basis, monetary success will come as a natural byproduct of your efforts.

Instead of worrying about the money, concern yourself with doing the right thing according to your plan. Making money is the result of effectively carrying out a well thought-out plan that utilizes sound principles. Focusing on the outcome will only distract you from the work needed to do achieve the result.

Focus on moving the ball across the net.
-
Mark Minervini

5 comments:

  1. Great observation. But the flaw here is the part about there being "no need to look at the score" for amateurs, because 99% of the time, amateurs must keep score themselves, there is not a judge or scorekeeper to do so thus keeping the player's mind off of it.

    thx

    ReplyDelete
  2. the master of ceremonies,
    The "scorekeeper" is your brokerage house and the "scoreboard" is your brokerage statement.
    The truth of your trading will show up there.
    -Mark

    ReplyDelete
  3. Very good point Mark. Beginners like me (2 years of swing and now mostly day-trading) pay too much attention and get worried by the scoreboard. Now, I'm trying to focus on developing a trading system that fits my capital,risk tolerance,and profit target.

    What's been bothering me in past 2 weeks is being shaken out of a trade only to see it go on to hit my targets later on in the day. I'm thinking of either waiting for a shake-out first or expanding my stop.

    ReplyDelete
  4. New-Temple,
    In my opinion, adding prior shakeouts as qualifying criteria is a better idea than widening your stop. My goal is to have the smallest stop-loss possible. Of course, not all ideas will have shakeouts beforehand.
    Best wishes.
    -Mark

    ReplyDelete
  5. Mark,

    You are right. I will try to add a shake-out as criteria vs. expanding my stop lose. While trading with a friend today, I made a conscious decision to wait and told myself, a trader's job is not really to trade, but to wait...trading should be the last thing he does after watching, waiting, accessing risk/reward.

    The result was less trades but more winning ones. The hardest thing for a trader who watches the screen all day is sitting idle and controlling the urge/inch to pull the trigger on a trade.

    ReplyDelete

Blog Archive - Read Mark's Past Posts

MARK MINERVINI'S STOCK SELECTION STRATEGY

Specific Entry Point Analysis® -SEPA®

Specific Entry Point Analysis® - SEPA® was developed by Mark Minervini. The methodology’s foundation is built upon historical precedent analysis of past stock market “SUPER PERFORMERS.” To determine what characteristics make a stock likely to advance significantly, historical models of top price performers and industry leaders are archived in the Minervini confidential database. These models are based upon sets of characteristics prevalent in exceptional winning stocks.

PATTERNS OF EXCELLENCE
On-going efforts are focused on identifying in detail the characteristics of the most successful performers of the past to determine what makes a stock likely to outperform its peers in the future. Based on these attributes, current investment candidates can be compared and scrutinized for criteria in-line with our proprietary Leadership Profile®. This success blueprint is the fundamental basis for our stock selection. The database and profile is continually updated to account for market dynamics and new available data. The SEPA® model takes into account thousands of historic company profiles going back over many market cycles spanning numerous decades. In order to find rapidly growing companies with the ability to sustain above average appreciation, a unique combination of quantitative screening, fundamental research and qualitative analysis serve as core selection criteria for the SEPA® investment process.

Additionally, the SEPA® ranking process scores each company based on earnings surprises, estimate revisions and company issued guidance in order to determine the probability for future price performance catalysts. A unique component of the SEPA® process is a focus on “where” a stock is within its earnings maturation cycle. Each day, computers systematically analyze thousands of stocks for specific data items using a proprietary series of absolute, relative and time dimension calculations. The extensive fundamental research ranks each investment candidate for probable earnings surprise.

Specific Entry Point Analysis® focuses on identifying, company-by-company, the precursors of inefficient pricing in order to distinguish appropriate entry points. Utilizing SEPA® Technology, stocks displaying the potential for significant price appreciation are identified and pinpointed. While nothing is perfect, the proven SEPA® Technology consistently highlights many of the best investment ideas and stock market leaders before they’re widely recognized by Wall Street.

The SEPA® screening process can be summarized as follows:

1. Stocks are screened through a series of "filters" based on earnings, sales, profit margins, relative price performance and price trend characteristics. Approximately 95% of all stocks in the market are eliminated in this first screen leaving roughly 1,000 initial contenders.

2. These remaining stocks are scrutinized and ranked for similarity to a proprietary Leadership Profile® in-line with specific fundamental and technical factors exhibited by historic models. This second stage of qualifiers removes most of the remaining companies, leaving a narrowed list of investment ideas for further review and evaluation.

3. The final stage is a comprehensive manual review. The narrowed list of candidates are examined individually and scored according to a “relative prioritizing” ranking process which considers the following characteristics:

- Reported earnings and sales
- Earnings surprise history
- EPS and sales acceleration
- Company issued guidance
- Earnings estimate revisions
- Profit margins (historic & projected)
- Industry and market position
- Potential "catalysts" (new products, services or industry changes)
- Performance compared to other stocks in same sector
- Price momentum, price trend and trading volume analysis
- Liquidity

The SEPA® ranking process is focused on identifying three key elements:

1. The potential for future earnings and sales surprises
2. The potential for institutional volume support
3. The potential for rapid price appreciation based on a supply/demand imbalance

Profiting from the Earnings Cycle

Individual stocks can go through extended periods of underperformance, in some instances for decades – Eastman Kodak’s stock price took twenty-four years (1973-1997) to just break even while the S&P 500 Index advanced 500%. While some stocks languish, companies with superior improving fundamentals can perform exceptionally well.

Large institutional buyers (mutual funds, pension plans, hedge funds, etc.) have the greatest buying power to influence a stock’s share price. So, what do they look for? Earnings and sales surprise and estimate revisions contribute to valuation model changes and thus impact buying and selling pressure. The subsequent buying pressure that comes from an earnings surprise or a company materially raising guidance generally leads to a higher stock price, which in turn attracts momentum buyers.

An understanding of how Wall Street works and identifying what specific characteristic will attract institutional buyers into a stock is our daily focus. The graph below illustrates a typical earnings maturation cycle and where we focus our efforts on buying and selling within the cycle
Summary of the SEPA® Process

HISTORICAL PRECEDENT ANALYSIS
-Study of the best performing stocks over each market cycle
-Characteristics defined and archived in our database
-Blueprint is constructed based on attributes of winners

COMPUTER SURVEILLANCE
-Computers screen 8,000+ stocks daily
-Narrows down the top 1%
-Companies displaying specific characteristics are identified


LEADERSHIP PROFILING
-Data is compared to all stocks
-Results are compared to a Leadership Profile®
-Profile is continually updated to reflect new information

RANKING AND SELECTION
-Candidates are monitored for specific criteria convergence
-Catalyst such as earnings surprise, company issued guidance
-Entry point defined based on risk/reward

GET MARKET UPDATES HERE

Jack Schwager - Winning Methods of the Market Wizards

INSIGHT FROM AMERICA'S TOP TRADER

Mark Minervini's financial advice and SEPA® stock selections sold exclusively to institutional investors for $120,000 annually. Get insight, stories and stock picks from the Stock Market Wizard here FREE!